↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of Hepatitis C in Children: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of Hepatitis C in Children: A Systematic Review
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011542
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jia Hu, Karen Doucette, Lisa Hartling, Lisa Tjosvold, Joan Robinson

Abstract

Current guidelines recommend children be treated for hepatitis C virus (HCV) using the same principles applied in adults. There are however few published studies which assess the efficacy and safety of HCV therapy in children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Spain 1 2%
Egypt 1 2%
Unknown 62 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 17 26%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,511,776
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#61,984
of 194,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,852
of 94,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#243
of 719 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 719 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.