↓ Skip to main content

Will human influences on evolutionary dynamics in the wild pervade the Anthropocene?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
104 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Will human influences on evolutionary dynamics in the wild pervade the Anthropocene?
Published in
BMC Biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12915-017-0476-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fanie Pelletier, David W. Coltman

Abstract

The five most pervasive anthropogenic threats to biodiversity are over-exploitation, habitat changes, climate change, invasive species, and pollution. Since all of these threats can affect intraspecific biodiversity-including genetic variation within populations-humans have the potential to induce contemporary microevolution in wild populations. We highlight recent empirical studies that have explored the effects of these anthropogenic threats to intraspecific biodiversity in the wild. We conclude that it is critical that we move towards a predictive framework that integrates a better understanding of contemporary microevolution to multiple threats to forecast the fate of natural populations in a changing world.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 220 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 22%
Researcher 37 17%
Student > Master 37 17%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 38 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 45%
Environmental Science 42 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Social Sciences 2 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 55 25%