↓ Skip to main content

Basic mechanisms of rTMS: Implications in Parkinson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Medicine, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 103)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Basic mechanisms of rTMS: Implications in Parkinson's disease
Published in
International Archives of Medicine, April 2008
DOI 10.1186/1755-7682-1-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oscar Arias-Carrión

Abstract

Basic and clinical research suggests a potential role for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. However, compared to the growing number of clinical studies on its putative therapeutic properties, the studies on the basic mechanisms of rTMS are surprisingly scarce.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 126 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Student > Bachelor 26 19%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Master 19 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 22%
Neuroscience 24 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 15%
Engineering 12 9%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 25 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Medicine
#33
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,808
of 95,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Medicine
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.