↓ Skip to main content

A synthetic approach to weathering degree classification of stone relics case study of the Yungang Grottoes

Overview of attention for article published in Heritage Science, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A synthetic approach to weathering degree classification of stone relics case study of the Yungang Grottoes
Published in
Heritage Science, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40494-017-0165-y
Authors

Tianhua Meng, Yuhe Lu, Guozhong Zhao, Chengquan Yang, Jianguang Ren, Yunlong Shi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 10%
Materials Science 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,964,325
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#304
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,671
of 443,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.