↓ Skip to main content

Potentiating angiogenesis arrest in vivo via laser irradiation of peptide functionalised gold nanoparticles

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanobiotechnology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potentiating angiogenesis arrest in vivo via laser irradiation of peptide functionalised gold nanoparticles
Published in
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12951-017-0321-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro Pedrosa, Amelie Heuer-Jungemann, Antonios G. Kanaras, Alexandra R. Fernandes, Pedro V. Baptista

Abstract

Anti-angiogenic therapy has great potential for cancer therapy with several FDA approved formulations but there are considerable side effects upon the normal blood vessels that decrease the potential application of such therapeutics. Chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) has been used as a model to study angiogenesis in vivo. Using a CAM model, it had been previously shown that spherical gold nanoparticles functionalised with an anti-angiogenic peptide can humper neo-angiogenesis. Our results show that gold nanoparticles conjugated with an anti-angiogenic peptide can be combined with visible laser irradiation to enhance angiogenesis arrest in vivo. We show that a green laser coupled to gold nanoparticles can achieve high localized temperatures able to precisely cauterize blood vessels. This combined therapy acts via VEGFR pathway inhibition, leading to a fourfold reduction in FLT-1 expression. The proposed phototherapy extends the use of visible lasers in clinics, combining it with chemotherapy to potentiate cancer treatment. This approach allows the reduction of dose of anti-angiogenic peptide, thus reducing possible side effects, while destroying blood vessels supply critical for tumour progression.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Unspecified 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,459,801
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#1,243
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#372,584
of 437,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.