↓ Skip to main content

Differing Mechanisms Underlie Sexual Size-Dimorphism in Two Populations of a Sex-Changing Fish

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differing Mechanisms Underlie Sexual Size-Dimorphism in Two Populations of a Sex-Changing Fish
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010616
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark I. McCormick, Christopher A. Ryen, Philip L. Munday, Stefan P. W. Walker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 51 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 26%
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 7 13%
Other 5 9%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 59%
Environmental Science 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2011.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#118,148
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,208
of 108,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#382
of 737 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 737 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.