↓ Skip to main content

Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
patent
110 patents
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14087 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7640 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries
Published in
Nature, November 2001
DOI 10.1038/35104644
Pubmed ID
Authors

J.-M. Tarascon, M. Armand

Abstract

Technological improvements in rechargeable solid-state batteries are being driven by an ever-increasing demand for portable electronic devices. Lithium-ion batteries are the systems of choice, offering high energy density, flexible and lightweight design, and longer lifespan than comparable battery technologies. We present a brief historical review of the development of lithium-based rechargeable batteries, highlight ongoing research strategies, and discuss the challenges that remain regarding the synthesis, characterization, electrochemical performance and safety of these systems.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7,640 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 83 1%
United Kingdom 19 <1%
Germany 15 <1%
India 14 <1%
Japan 13 <1%
Sweden 12 <1%
Canada 8 <1%
China 7 <1%
Korea, Republic of 6 <1%
Other 75 <1%
Unknown 7388 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1763 23%
Student > Master 1480 19%
Student > Bachelor 1295 17%
Researcher 943 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 459 6%
Other 1159 15%
Unknown 541 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 2283 30%
Chemistry 1353 18%
Engineering 789 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 553 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 410 5%
Other 1445 19%
Unknown 807 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2021.
All research outputs
#932,220
of 18,846,561 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#29,177
of 82,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,848
of 304,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#588
of 921 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,846,561 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 93.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 921 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.