You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Antiretroviral Intensification and Valproic Acid Lack Sustained Effect on Residual HIV-1 Viremia or Resting CD4+ Cell Infection
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2010
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0009390 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nancie M. Archin, Manzoor Cheema, Daniel Parker, Ann Wiegand, Ronald J. Bosch, John M. Coffin, Joseph Eron, Myron Cohen, David M. Margolis |
Abstract |
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection that persists despite antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a daunting problem. Given the limited evidence that resting CD4+ T cell infection (RCI) is affected by the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor valproic acid (VPA), we measured the stability of RCI and residual viremia in patients who added VPA with or without raltegravir (RAL), or enfuvirtide (ENF) with or without VPA, to standard ART. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 4% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 100 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 27% |
Researcher | 17 | 15% |
Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Other | 21 | 19% |
Unknown | 16 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 25% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Unknown | 21 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,685,359
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#34,336
of 194,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,720
of 93,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#148
of 665 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 665 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.