↓ Skip to main content

Bottom-Up Fabrication of Semiconductive Metal-Organic Framework Ultrathin Films

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Materials, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bottom-Up Fabrication of Semiconductive Metal-Organic Framework Ultrathin Films
Published in
Advanced Materials, January 2018
DOI 10.1002/adma.201704291
Pubmed ID
Authors

Víctor Rubio-Giménez, Marta Galbiati, Javier Castells-Gil, Neyvis Almora-Barrios, José Navarro-Sánchez, Garin Escorcia-Ariza, Michele Mattera, Thomas Arnold, Jonathan Rawle, Sergio Tatay, Eugenio Coronado, Carlos Martí-Gastaldo

Abstract

Though generally considered insulating, recent progress on the discovery of conductive porous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) offers new opportunities for their integration as electroactive components in electronic devices. Compared to classical semiconductors, these metal-organic hybrids combine the crystallinity of inorganic materials with easier chemical functionalization and processability. Still, future development depends on the ability to produce high-quality films with fine control over their orientation, crystallinity, homogeneity, and thickness. Here self-assembled monolayer substrate modification and bottom-up techniques are used to produce preferentially oriented, ultrathin, conductive films of Cu-CAT-1. The approach permits to fabricate and study the electrical response of MOF-based devices incorporating the thinnest MOF film reported thus far (10 nm thick).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 26%
Researcher 22 18%
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 53 44%
Materials Science 20 17%
Engineering 6 5%
Chemical Engineering 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 26 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,865,646
of 17,601,811 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials
#2,628
of 12,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,024
of 375,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials
#89
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,601,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.