↓ Skip to main content

Medical versus surgical interventions for open angle glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medical versus surgical interventions for open angle glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004399.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Burr, Augusto Azuara-Blanco, Alison Avenell, Anja Tuulonen

Abstract

Open angle glaucoma (OAG) is a common cause of blindness.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 175 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Postgraduate 18 10%
Other 18 10%
Other 50 28%
Unknown 23 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 30 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,964,028
of 14,760,425 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,746
of 11,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,806
of 281,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#170
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,760,425 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.