↓ Skip to main content

Medical versus surgical interventions for open angle glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
357 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medical versus surgical interventions for open angle glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004399.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Burr, Augusto Azuara‐Blanco, Alison Avenell, Anja Tuulonen

Abstract

Open angle glaucoma (OAG) is a common cause of blindness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 352 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Student > Master 37 10%
Researcher 36 10%
Unspecified 33 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 7%
Other 89 25%
Unknown 98 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 133 37%
Unspecified 33 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Psychology 9 3%
Other 40 11%
Unknown 107 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,822,122
of 25,387,189 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,206
of 12,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,034
of 181,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.