↓ Skip to main content

Variations in ploidy among isolates of Botrytis cinerea: implications for genetic and molecular analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Current Genetics, May 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variations in ploidy among isolates of Botrytis cinerea: implications for genetic and molecular analyses
Published in
Current Genetics, May 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf00351784
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Büttner, Frank Koch, Kerstin Voigt, Thomas Quidde, Siegfried Risch, Rolf Blaich, Bettina Brückner, Paul Tudzynski

Abstract

Field isolates and laboratory strains of Botrytis cinerea, an ascomycetous fungus causing considerable economic losses, e.g., as "grey mould" of vine, were compared for differences in ploidy level by determining their DNA content per nucleus. Strain SAS56, an ascospore line used routinely for genetic analyses, is probably polyploid, since treatment with benomyl causes a significant reduction in DNA content per nucleus. This conclusion is substantiated by the increased sensitivity of the putative haploid derivatives to mutagens (UV and EMS). Molecular analyses (RAPD) of the haploidized strains indicate a very limited degree of heterozygosis of the parent strain SAS56. Analysis of field isolates of B. cinerea showed that their DNA content per nucleus varied considerably, indicating that aneuploidy/polyploidy is a widespread phenomenon in this species. This can explain both the variability and phenotypic instability of many field isolates of this fungus and the unusual difficulties faced by researchers in recovering stable recessive laboratory mutants. Since the haploid derivatives of SAS56 resemble the parent strain in their parasitic and physiological properties they should provide a good basis for classical and molecular genetic studies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 73 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 25%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Professor 6 8%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Engineering 4 5%
Chemistry 4 5%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Current Genetics
#329
of 1,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,551
of 22,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Genetics
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.