↓ Skip to main content

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for thermal burns

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for thermal burns
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004727.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Villanueva E, Bennett MH, Wasiak J, Lehm JP

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Colombia 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Other 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 53%
Unspecified 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 4 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2016.
All research outputs
#9,676,720
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,266
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,067
of 274,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#198
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.