You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hacia una salud pública orientada desde los determinantes sociales de la salud: informe de un taller
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gaceta Sanitaria, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.09.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elena González Rojo, Carlos Álvarez-Dardet, Luis Andrés López Fernández |
| Abstract |
This article is the result of a workshop with public health experts held in Granada (Spain) in October 2015 in order to reflect upon the components of the framework that should be part of a public health approach based on the social determinants of health. Advocacy and training professionals in health advocacy were identified as key elements where this was needed. During the workshop, it was agreed that the gender perspective, the salutogenic approach, interdisciplinary work and particular attention to disadvantaged groups are crucial. The importance of working from a human rights' framework and promoting legislative changes were also mentioned. Moreover, the group mentioned that even though much progress has been made identifying social determinants of health and creating conceptual frameworks, there is limited knowledge about how to intervene to reduce health inequality gaps in our societies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 26% |
| Grenada | 2 | 6% |
| Colombia | 2 | 6% |
| Cabo Verde | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 87% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 20% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,907,414
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Gaceta Sanitaria
#24
of 466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,136
of 348,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gaceta Sanitaria
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 466 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.