You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modelling the Species Distribution of Flat-Headed Cats (Prionailurus planiceps), an Endangered South-East Asian Small Felid
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0009612 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreas Wilting, Anna Cord, Andrew J. Hearn, Deike Hesse, Azlan Mohamed, Carl Traeholdt, Susan M. Cheyne, Sunarto Sunarto, Mohd-Azlan Jayasilan, Joanna Ross, Aurélie C. Shapiro, Anthony Sebastian, Stefan Dech, Christine Breitenmoser, Jim Sanderson, J. W. Duckworth, Heribert Hofer |
| Abstract |
The flat-headed cat (Prionailurus planiceps) is one of the world's least known, highly threatened felids with a distribution restricted to tropical lowland rainforests in Peninsular Thailand/Malaysia, Borneo and Sumatra. Throughout its geographic range large-scale anthropogenic transformation processes, including the pollution of fresh-water river systems and landscape fragmentation, raise concerns regarding its conservation status. Despite an increasing number of camera-trapping field surveys for carnivores in South-East Asia during the past two decades, few of these studies recorded the flat-headed cat. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 395 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 99 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 73 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 62 | 15% |
| Unknown | 56 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 191 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 127 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 4% |
| Unknown | 63 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,947,518
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#82,078
of 194,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,525
of 106,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#315
of 653 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 653 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.