↓ Skip to main content

Magnesium sulphate versus phenytoin for eclampsia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnesium sulphate versus phenytoin for eclampsia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000128.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lelia Duley, David J Henderson-Smart, Doris Chou

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 203 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 17%
Student > Bachelor 33 16%
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Other 12 6%
Other 40 19%
Unknown 42 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Social Sciences 19 9%
Psychology 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 50 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,265,144
of 16,430,781 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,024
of 11,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,494
of 292,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#125
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,430,781 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.