↓ Skip to main content

Polygyny in the great reed warbler, Acrocephalus arundinaceus: a possible case of deception

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, March 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polygyny in the great reed warbler, Acrocephalus arundinaceus: a possible case of deception
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, March 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf00310992
Authors

Clive Catchpole, Bernd Leisler, Hans Winkler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Romania 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 58%
Environmental Science 5 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,389
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,769
of 9,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.