↓ Skip to main content

Evolution and Taxonomic Classification of Human Papillomavirus 16 (HPV16)-Related Variant Genomes: HPV31, HPV33, HPV35, HPV52, HPV58 and HPV67

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolution and Taxonomic Classification of Human Papillomavirus 16 (HPV16)-Related Variant Genomes: HPV31, HPV33, HPV35, HPV52, HPV58 and HPV67
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0020183
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zigui Chen, Mark Schiffman, Rolando Herrero, Rob DeSalle, Kathryn Anastos, Michel Segondy, Vikrant V. Sahasrabuddhe, Patti E. Gravitt, Ann W. Hsing, Robert D. Burk

Abstract

Human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) species group (alpha-9) of the Alphapapillomavirus genus contains HPV16, HPV31, HPV33, HPV35, HPV52, HPV58 and HPV67. These HPVs account for 75% of invasive cervical cancers worldwide. Viral variants of these HPVs differ in evolutionary history and pathogenicity. Moreover, a comprehensive nomenclature system for HPV variants is lacking, limiting comparisons between studies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 199 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 16%
Student > Bachelor 31 15%
Student > Master 30 15%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 44 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 48 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,694
of 194,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,024
of 112,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#778
of 1,692 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,692 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.