↓ Skip to main content

On the Origin of the Non-brittle Rachis Trait of Domesticated Einkorn Wheat

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the Origin of the Non-brittle Rachis Trait of Domesticated Einkorn Wheat
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.02031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad Pourkheirandish, Fei Dai, Shun Sakuma, Hiroyuki Kanamori, Assaf Distelfeld, George Willcox, Taihachi Kawahara, Takashi Matsumoto, Benjamin Kilian, Takao Komatsuda

Abstract

Einkorn and emmer wheat together with barley were among the first cereals domesticated by humans more than 10,000 years ago, long before durum or bread wheat originated. Domesticated einkorn wheat differs from its wild progenitor in basic morphological characters such as the grain dispersal system. This study identified the Non-brittle rachis 1 (btr1) and Non-brittle rachis 2 (btr2) in einkorn as homologous to barley. Re-sequencing of the Btr1 and Btr2 in a collection of 53 lines showed that a single non-synonymous amino acid substitution (alanine to threonine) at position 119 at btr1, is responsible for the non-brittle rachis trait in domesticated einkorn. Tracing this haplotype variation back to wild einkorn samples provides further evidence that the einkorn progenitor came from the Northern Levant. We show that the geographical origin of domesticated haplotype coincides with the non-brittle domesticated barley haplotypes, which suggest the non-brittle rachis phenotypes of einkorn and barley were fixed in same geographic area in today's South-east Turkey.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 18%
Unspecified 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 23 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,342,992
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#942
of 24,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,073
of 454,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#30
of 433 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,959 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 433 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.