↓ Skip to main content

Clinical advantage and tolerability of ibandronate in hemodialysis patients: a retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Renal Replacement Therapy, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical advantage and tolerability of ibandronate in hemodialysis patients: a retrospective study
Published in
Renal Replacement Therapy, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41100-018-0144-0
Authors

Satoru Mitsuboshi, Hitoshi Yamada, Kazuhiko Nagai, Hideo Okajima

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2018.
All research outputs
#17,740,611
of 21,945,694 outputs
Outputs from Renal Replacement Therapy
#68
of 85 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,693
of 403,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Renal Replacement Therapy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,945,694 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them