Title |
Adjunctive therapy for severe malaria: a review and critical appraisal
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12936-018-2195-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rosauro Varo, Valerie M. Crowley, Antonio Sitoe, Lola Madrid, Lena Serghides, Kevin C. Kain, Quique Bassat |
Abstract |
Despite recent efforts and successes in reducing the malaria burden globally, this infection still accounts for an estimated 212 million clinical cases, 2 million severe malaria cases, and approximately 429,000 deaths annually. Even with the routine use of effective anti-malarial drugs, the case fatality rate for severe malaria remains unacceptably high, with cerebral malaria being one of the most life-threatening complications. Up to one-third of cerebral malaria survivors are left with long-term cognitive and neurological deficits. From a population point of view, the decrease of malaria transmission may jeopardize the development of naturally acquired immunity against the infection, leading to fewer total cases, but potentially an increase in severe cases. The pathophysiology of severe and cerebral malaria is not completely understood, but both parasite and host determinants contribute to its onset and outcomes. Adjunctive therapy, based on modulating the host response to infection, could help to improve the outcomes achieved with specific anti-malarial therapy. In the last decades, several interventions targeting different pathways have been tested. However, none of these strategies have demonstrated clear beneficial effects, and some have shown deleterious outcomes. This review aims to summarize evidence from clinical trials testing different adjunctive therapy for severe and cerebral malaria in humans. It also highlights some preclinical studies which have evaluated novel strategies and other candidate therapeutics that may be evaluated in future clinical trials. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Tanzania, United Republic of | 6 | 16% |
Australia | 2 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
United States | 2 | 5% |
Senegal | 1 | 3% |
Kenya | 1 | 3% |
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 19 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 24 | 65% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 16% |
Scientists | 5 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 169 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 33 | 20% |
Researcher | 25 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
Other | 25 | 15% |
Unknown | 43 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 11% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
Other | 21 | 12% |
Unknown | 54 | 32% |