↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic vs open surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laparoscopic vs open surgery
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, January 2000
DOI 10.1007/s004649900003
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. Velanovich

Abstract

The purported advantages of laparoscopic surgery over conventional open techniques are less pain and faster return to normal functional status. Very few studies have included validated measures of quality of life as end points. This study prospectively assessed the health status outcomes of patients undergoing four types of laparoscopic and open operations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 80 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 38%
Engineering 11 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 29 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,948,144
of 23,924,883 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,762
of 6,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,300
of 111,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,419 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.