↓ Skip to main content

Recombinants proteins for industrial uses: utilization of Pichia pastoris expression system

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 1,377)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recombinants proteins for industrial uses: utilization of Pichia pastoris expression system
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, January 2013
DOI 10.1590/s1517-83822013005000041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Rabert, Daniel Weinacker, Adalberto Pessoa, Jorge G. Farías

Abstract

The innovation in industrial process with impact in the efficient production is the major challenge for actual industry. A high numerous of enzymes are utilized in at different level of process; the search for new alternatives with better characteristic has become a field of study of great interest, the recombinant protein achievement in a different host system is an alternative widely assessed for production of this. The microorganism Pichia pastoris has been used like a successful expression system in diverse areas, improved the yield and extraction-recovery of the product expressed. The reported of diverse authors in the production of enzymes with different application in industry is varied, in this review the different industry areas and the characteristic of the enzymes produced are detailed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 189 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 17%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 41 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 64 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 23%
Engineering 11 6%
Chemical Engineering 7 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 43 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,415,350
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
#48
of 1,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,128
of 289,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
#7
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,377 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.