You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Extreme High‐Temperature Events Over East Asia in 1.5°C and 2°C Warmer Futures: Analysis of NCAR CESM Low‐Warming Experiments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geophysical Research Letters, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/2017gl076753 |
| Authors |
Donghuan Li, Tianjun Zhou, Liwei Zou, Wenxia Zhang, Lixia Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 9% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Finland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 29 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 40 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2018.
All research outputs
#846,121
of 24,138,997 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#1,724
of 20,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,154
of 444,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#42
of 367 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,138,997 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 367 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.