You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementation of a National Trauma Research Action Plan (NTRAP)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1097/ta.0000000000001812 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eileen M. Bulger, Todd E. Rasmussen, Gregory J. Jurkovich, Timothy C. Fabian, Rosemary A. Kozar, Raul Coimbra, Todd W. Costantini, James Ficke, Ajai K. Malhotra, Michelle A. Price, Sharon L. Smith, William G. Cioffi, Ronald M. Stewart |
| Abstract |
Traumatic injury is a significant public health problem and the leading cause of death under age 44 in the United States. Federal investment in research funding is needed to address this issue and minimize death and disability. This report seeks to lay out a strategy for the development and implementation of a National Trauma Research Action Plan as described in the 2016 report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) entitled, Integrating Military and Civilian Trauma Systems to Achieve Zero Preventable Deaths after Injury. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 32 | 67% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Georgia | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 33% |
| Scientists | 6 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 18% |
| Professor | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 53% |
| Psychology | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,369,183
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The
#361
of 7,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,762
of 343,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The
#18
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.