↓ Skip to main content

Personalization of cancer treatment using predictive simulation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Personalization of cancer treatment using predictive simulation
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12967-015-0399-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole A Doudican, Ansu Kumar, Neeraj Kumar Singh, Prashant R Nair, Deepak A Lala, Kabya Basu, Anay A Talawdekar, Zeba Sultana, Krishna Kumar Tiwari, Anuj Tyagi, Taher Abbasi, Shireen Vali, Ravi Vij, Mark Fiala, Justin King, MaryAnn Perle, Amitabha Mazumder

Abstract

BackgroundThe personalization of cancer treatments implies the reconsideration of a one-size-fits-all paradigm. This move has spawned increased use of next generation sequencing to understand mutations and copy number aberrations in cancer cells. Initial personalization successes have been primarily driven by drugs targeting one patient-specific oncogene (e.g., Gleevec, Xalkori, Herceptin). Unfortunately, most cancers include a multitude of aberrations, and the overall impact on cancer signaling and metabolic networks cannot be easily nullified by a single drug.MethodsWe used a novel predictive simulation approach to create an avatar of patient cancer cells using point mutations and copy number aberration data. Simulation avatars of myeloma patients were functionally screened using various molecularly targeted drugs both individually and in combination to identify drugs that are efficacious and synergistic. Repurposing of drugs that are FDA-approved or under clinical study with validated clinical safety and pharmacokinetic data can provide a rapid translational path to the clinic. High-risk multiple myeloma patients were modeled, and the simulation predictions were assessed ex vivo using patient cells.ResultsHere, we present an approach to address the key challenge of interpreting patient profiling genomic signatures into actionable clinical insights to make the personalization of cancer therapy a practical reality. Through the rational design of personalized treatments, our approach also targets multiple patient-relevant pathways to address the emergence of single therapy resistance. Our predictive platform identified drug regimens for four high-risk multiple myeloma patients. The predicted regimes were found to be effective in ex vivo analyses using patient cells.ConclusionsThese multiple validations confirm this approach and methodology for the use of big data to create personalized therapeutics using predictive simulation approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 59 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Engineering 5 8%
Computer Science 3 5%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,324,623
of 25,418,993 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#582
of 4,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,293
of 361,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#14
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,418,993 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.