You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-Field fMRI Reveals Brain Activation Patterns Underlying Saccade Execution in the Human Superior Colliculus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0008691 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth M. Krebs, Marty G. Woldorff, Claus Tempelmann, Nils Bodammer, Toemme Noesselt, Carsten N. Boehler, Henning Scheich, Jens-Max Hopf, Emrah Duzel, Hans-Jochen Heinze, Mircea A. Schoenfeld |
| Abstract |
The superior colliculus (SC) has been shown to play a crucial role in the initiation and coordination of eye- and head-movements. The knowledge about the function of this structure is mainly based on single-unit recordings in animals with relatively few neuroimaging studies investigating eye-movement related brain activity in humans. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 34 | 27% |
| Neuroscience | 29 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 13% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,948,032
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#82,084
of 194,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,000
of 164,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#309
of 613 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 613 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.