You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Minocycline Synergizes with N-Acetylcysteine and Improves Cognition and Memory Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0012490 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samah G. Abdel Baki, Ben Schwab, Margalit Haber, André A. Fenton, Peter J. Bergold |
| Abstract |
There are no drugs presently available to treat traumatic brain injury (TBI). A variety of single drugs have failed clinical trials suggesting a role for drug combinations. Drug combinations acting synergistically often provide the greatest combination of potency and safety. The drugs examined (minocycline (MINO), N-acetylcysteine (NAC), simvastatin, cyclosporine A, and progesterone) had FDA-approval for uses other than TBI and limited brain injury in experimental TBI models. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 25% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 32% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 12% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,170,357
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#59,264
of 194,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,504
of 94,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#283
of 856 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 856 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.