You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Self-regulation of secondary school students: self-assessments are inaccurate and insufficiently used for learning-task selection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Instructional Science, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11251-018-9448-2 |
| Authors |
Michelle L. Nugteren, Halszka Jarodzka, Liesbeth Kester, Jeroen J. G. Van Merriënboer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 5 | 17% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Namibia | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 66% |
| Scientists | 9 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 135 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 24 | 18% |
| Psychology | 22 | 16% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 50 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,547,319
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Instructional Science
#19
of 468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,281
of 441,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Instructional Science
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 468 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.