↓ Skip to main content

Nucleotide Discrimination with DNA Immobilized in the MspA Nanopore

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
46 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nucleotide Discrimination with DNA Immobilized in the MspA Nanopore
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025723
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth A. Manrao, Ian M. Derrington, Mikhail Pavlenok, Michael Niederweis, Jens H. Gundlach

Abstract

Nanopore sequencing has the potential to become a fast and low-cost DNA sequencing platform. An ionic current passing through a small pore would directly map the sequence of single stranded DNA (ssDNA) driven through the constriction. The pore protein, MspA, derived from Mycobacterium smegmatis, has a short and narrow channel constriction ideally suited for nanopore sequencing. To study MspA's ability to resolve nucleotides, we held ssDNA within the pore using a biotin-NeutrAvidin complex. We show that homopolymers of adenine, cytosine, thymine, and guanine in MspA exhibit much larger current differences than in α-hemolysin. Additionally, methylated cytosine is distinguishable from unmethylated cytosine. We establish that single nucleotide substitutions within homopolymer ssDNA can be detected when held in MspA's constriction. Using genomic single nucleotide polymorphisms, we demonstrate that single nucleotides within random DNA can be identified. Our results indicate that MspA has high signal-to-noise ratio and the single nucleotide sensitivity desired for nanopore sequencing devices.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 197 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 28%
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 19%
Engineering 20 10%
Physics and Astronomy 18 9%
Chemistry 18 9%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 38 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,403,835
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#44,761
of 201,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,198
of 134,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#461
of 2,627 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,627 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.