↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for preventing unintended repeat pregnancies among adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for preventing unintended repeat pregnancies among adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011477
Authors

Rabeea'h W Aslam, Maggie Hendry, Ben Carter, Jane Noyes, Jo Rycroft Malone, Andrew Booth, Diana Pasterfield, Joanna Mary Charles, Noel Craine, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Lupetu Ives Ntambwe, Nefyn Williams, Rhiannon Whitaker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 22%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 5 5%
Other 23 24%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 16%
Social Sciences 15 16%
Psychology 10 11%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 14 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2016.
All research outputs
#8,587,797
of 16,339,421 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,710
of 11,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,359
of 291,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#189
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,339,421 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.