↓ Skip to main content

Guideline for the investigation and initial therapy of diarrhea-negative hemolytic uremic syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guideline for the investigation and initial therapy of diarrhea-negative hemolytic uremic syndrome
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00467-008-0964-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gema Ariceta, Nesrin Besbas, Sally Johnson, Diana Karpman, Daniel Landau, Christoph Licht, Chantal Loirat, Carmine Pecoraro, C. Mark Taylor, Nicole Van de Kar, Johan VandeWalle, Lothar B. Zimmerhackl

Abstract

This guideline for the investigation and initial treatment of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is intended to offer an approach based on opinion, as evidence is lacking. It builds on the current ability to identify the etiology of specific diagnostic sub-groups of HUS. HUS in children is mostly due to infection, enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC), Shigella dysenteriae type 1 in some geographic regions, and invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae. These sub-groups are relatively straightforward to diagnose. Their management, which is outside the remit of this guideline, is related to control of infection where that is necessary and supportive measures for the anemia and acute renal failure. A thorough investigation of the remainder of childhood HUS cases, commonly referred to as "atypical" HUS, will reveal a risk factor for the syndrome in approximately 60% of cases. Disorders of complement regulation are, numerically, the most important. The outcome for children with atypical HUS is poor, and, because of the rarity of these disorders, clinical experience is scanty. Some cases of complement dysfunction appear to respond to plasma therapy. The therapeutic part of this guideline is the consensus of the contributing authors and is based on limited information from uncontrolled studies. The guideline proposes urgent and empirical plasmapheresis replacement with whole plasma fraction for the first month after diagnosis. This should only be undertaken in specialized pediatric nephrology centers where appropriate medical and nursing skills are available. The guideline includes defined terminology and audit points so that the early clinical effectiveness of the strategy can be evaluated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 148 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 25 16%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 10%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 45 28%
Unknown 27 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 30 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#1,484
of 3,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,012
of 94,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,535 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.