↓ Skip to main content

Prediction of opioid dose in cancer pain patients using genetic profiling: not yet an option with support vector machine learning

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prediction of opioid dose in cancer pain patients using genetic profiling: not yet an option with support vector machine learning
Published in
BMC Research Notes, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13104-018-3194-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Estrup Olesen, Debbie Grønlund, Mikkel Gram, Frank Skorpen, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, Pål Klepstad

Abstract

Use of opioids for pain management has increased over the past decade; however, inadequate analgesic response is common. Genetic variability may be related to opioid efficacy, but due to the many possible combinations and variables, statistical computations may be difficult. This study investigated whether data processing with support vector machine learning could predict required opioid dose in cancer pain patients, using genetic profiling. Eighteen single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the µ and δ opioid receptor genes and the catechol-O-methyltransferase gene were selected for analysis. Data from 1237 cancer pain patients were included in the analysis. Support vector machine learning did not find any associations between the assessed SNPs and opioid dose in cancer pain patients, and hence, did not provide additional information regarding prediction of required opioid dose using genetic profiling.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 17 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 20 42%