↓ Skip to main content

Updated Procedures for Using Drill Cores and Cuttings at the Lithologic Core Storage Library, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Updated Procedures for Using Drill Cores and Cuttings at the Lithologic Core Storage Library, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2018
DOI 10.3133/ofr20181001
Authors

Hodges, Mary K.V., Davis, Linda C., Bartholomay, Roy C.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,747,067
of 12,448,635 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#702
of 1,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,240
of 339,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#49
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,448,635 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.