You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Serial Killing of Tumor Cells by Human Natural Killer Cells – Enhancement by Therapeutic Antibodies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000326 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rauf Bhat, Carsten Watzl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 25% |
| Researcher | 43 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 49 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 44 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 8% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 37 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,716,900
of 23,578,176 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#68,615
of 201,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,378
of 77,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#64
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.