↓ Skip to main content

Scabies: more than just an irritation

Overview of attention for article published in Postgraduate Medical Journal, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scabies: more than just an irritation
Published in
Postgraduate Medical Journal, July 2004
DOI 10.1136/pgmj.2003.014563
Pubmed ID
Authors

J S McCarthy

Abstract

Human scabies, caused by skin infestation with the arthropod mite, Sarcoptes scabiei, typically results in a papular, intensely pruritic eruption involving the interdigital spaces, and flexure creases. Recent research has led to a reassessment of the morbidity attributable to this parasite in endemic communities, particularly resulting from secondary skin sepsis and postinfective complications including glomerulonephritis. This has led to studies of the benefits of community based control programmes, and to concerns regarding the emergence of drug resistance when such strategies are employed. The renewed research interest into the biology of this infection has resulted in the application of molecular tools. This has established that canine and human scabies populations are genetically distinct, a finding with major implications for the formulation of public health control policies. Further research is needed to increase understanding of drug resistance, and to identify new drug targets and potential vaccine candidates.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Ecuador 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 19%
Researcher 13 15%
Unspecified 11 13%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Other 26 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 53%
Unspecified 15 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 14 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2019.
All research outputs
#646,871
of 13,420,122 outputs
Outputs from Postgraduate Medical Journal
#129
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,382
of 277,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Postgraduate Medical Journal
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,420,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.