You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do night-active birds lack daily melatonin rhythms? A case study comparing a diurnal and a nocturnal-foraging gull species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ornithology, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10336-005-0018-4 |
| Authors |
Martin Wikelski, Elisa M. Tarlow, Corine M. Eising, Ton G.G. Groothuis, Ebo Gwinner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 3 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Ghana | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Romania | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 25% |
| Researcher | 15 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 77% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,190,525
of 23,933,166 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#651
of 1,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,166
of 158,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,933,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.