↓ Skip to main content

Short-term efficacy of physical interventions in osteoarthritic knee pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
patent
18 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
260 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
338 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Short-term efficacy of physical interventions in osteoarthritic knee pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-8-51
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan M Bjordal, Mark I Johnson, Rodrigo AB Lopes-Martins, Bård Bogen, Roberta Chow, Anne E Ljunggren

Abstract

Treatment efficacy of physical agents in osteoarthritis of the knee (OAK) pain has been largely unknown, and this systematic review was aimed at assessing their short-term efficacies for pain relief.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 326 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 18%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Researcher 37 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 8%
Other 26 8%
Other 77 23%
Unknown 70 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Engineering 10 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 92 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,921,532
of 23,524,722 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#380
of 4,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,822
of 69,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,524,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.