↓ Skip to main content

Rapid Acoustic Survey for Biodiversity Appraisal

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
467 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
860 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid Acoustic Survey for Biodiversity Appraisal
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0004065
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jérôme Sueur, Sandrine Pavoine, Olivier Hamerlynck, Stéphanie Duvail

Abstract

Biodiversity assessment remains one of the most difficult challenges encountered by ecologists and conservation biologists. This task is becoming even more urgent with the current increase of habitat loss. Many methods-from rapid biodiversity assessments (RBA) to all-taxa biodiversity inventories (ATBI)-have been developed for decades to estimate local species richness. However, these methods are costly and invasive. Several animals-birds, mammals, amphibians, fishes and arthropods-produce sounds when moving, communicating or sensing their environment. Here we propose a new concept and method to describe biodiversity. We suggest to forego species or morphospecies identification used by ATBI and RBA respectively but rather to tackle the problem at another evolutionary unit, the community level. We also propose that a part of diversity can be estimated and compared through a rapid acoustic analysis of the sound produced by animal communities. We produced alpha and beta diversity indexes that we first tested with 540 simulated acoustic communities. The alpha index, which measures acoustic entropy, shows a logarithmic correlation with the number of species within the acoustic community. The beta index, which estimates both temporal and spectral dissimilarities, is linearly linked to the number of unshared species between acoustic communities. We then applied both indexes to two closely spaced Tanzanian dry lowland coastal forests. Indexes reveal for this small sample a lower acoustic diversity for the most disturbed forest and acoustic dissimilarities between the two forests suggest that degradation could have significantly decreased and modified community composition. Our results demonstrate for the first time that an indicator of biological diversity can be reliably obtained in a non-invasive way and with a limited sampling effort. This new approach may facilitate the appraisal of animal diversity at large spatial and temporal scales.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 860 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 1%
Brazil 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Puerto Rico 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Panama 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 14 2%
Unknown 821 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 162 19%
Researcher 153 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 144 17%
Student > Bachelor 114 13%
Student > Postgraduate 37 4%
Other 112 13%
Unknown 138 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 364 42%
Environmental Science 177 21%
Engineering 41 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 26 3%
Computer Science 22 3%
Other 57 7%
Unknown 173 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,264,114
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#16,718
of 194,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,067
of 169,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#46
of 458 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 458 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.