↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review of dexketoprofen in acute and chronic pain

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Clinical Pharmacology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic review of dexketoprofen in acute and chronic pain
Published in
BMC Clinical Pharmacology, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1472-6904-8-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

R Andrew Moore, Jodie Barden

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Unknown 85 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Professor 6 7%
Other 23 26%
Unknown 23 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 9%
Chemistry 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2012.
All research outputs
#7,545,385
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from BMC Clinical Pharmacology
#27
of 57 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,686
of 92,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Clinical Pharmacology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them