↓ Skip to main content

GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN THE SONG OF WILLOW FLYCATCHERS: DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN EMPIDONAX TRAILLII ADASTUS AND E. T. EXTIMUS

Overview of attention for article published in The Auk, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN THE SONG OF WILLOW FLYCATCHERS: DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN EMPIDONAX TRAILLII ADASTUS AND E. T. EXTIMUS
Published in
The Auk, January 2001
DOI 10.1642/0004-8038(2001)118[0366:gvitso]2.0.co;2
Authors

James A. Sedgwick

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,486,051
of 17,355,315 outputs
Outputs from The Auk
#405
of 1,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,248
of 295,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Auk
#18
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,355,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.