↓ Skip to main content

Attentional and Affective Processing of Sexual Stimuli in Women with Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attentional and Affective Processing of Sexual Stimuli in Women with Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10508-011-9820-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marieke Brauer, Matthijs van Leeuwen, Erick Janssen, Sarah K. Newhouse, Julia R. Heiman, Ellen Laan

Abstract

Hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) is the most common sexual problem in women. From an incentive motivation perspective, HSDD may be the result of a weak association between sexual stimuli and rewarding experiences. As a consequence, these stimuli may either lose or fail to acquire a positive meaning, resulting in a limited number of incentives that have the capacity to elicit a sexual response. According to current information processing models of sexual arousal, sexual stimuli automatically activate meanings and if these are not predominantly positive, processes relevant to the activation of sexual arousal and desire may be interrupted. Premenopausal U.S. and Dutch women with acquired HSDD (n = 42) and a control group of sexually functional women (n = 42) completed a single target Implicit Association Task and a Picture Association Task assessing automatic affective associations with sexual stimuli and a dot detection task measuring attentional capture by sexual stimuli. Results showed that women with acquired HSDD displayed less positive (but not more negative) automatic associations with sexual stimuli than sexually functional women. The same pattern was found for self-reported affective sex-related associations. Participants were slower to detect targets in the dot detection task that replaced sexual images, irrespective of sexual function status. As such, the findings point to the relevance of affective processing of sexual stimuli in women with HSDD, and imply that the treatment of HSDD might benefit from a stronger emphasis on the strengthening of the association between sexual stimuli and positive meaning and sexual reward.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 23%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 57%
Neuroscience 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 13 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2012.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,127
of 3,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,509
of 125,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#18
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.