You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sugarbeet culture and mormon economic development in the Intermountain West
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, April 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02861211 |
| Authors |
Robert A. Burton, Paul Alan Cox |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#272
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,977
of 32,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.