↓ Skip to main content

Locus of Control and Self-Efficacy: Potential Mediators of Stress, Illness, and Utilization of Health Services in College Students

Overview of attention for article published in Child Psychiatry & Human Development, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 935)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
295 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Locus of Control and Self-Efficacy: Potential Mediators of Stress, Illness, and Utilization of Health Services in College Students
Published in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10578-010-0173-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Roddenberry, Kimberly Renk

Abstract

Although many studies examine the biological phenomena that mediate the relationship between stress and illness, more research is needed regarding psychological variables that may mediate this relationship. Thus, the current study investigates the mediating effects of locus of control and self-efficacy in the relationships among stress, illness, and the utilization of health services in a sample of 159 college students. Results suggest that participants who endorse higher levels of stress also endorse higher levels of illness, higher levels of external locus of control, and lower levels of self-efficacy. In addition, structural equation modeling suggests that there are direct relationships between stress and illness and between illness and the utilization of health services. Further, locus of control appears to be a partial mediator in the relationship between stress and illness. Given the link established between stress and illness and the individual differences associated with reactions to stressful situations, it is important for future examinations to continue to identify potential mediators of the stress-illness link.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 286 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 71 24%
Student > Master 51 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 12%
Researcher 22 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 50 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 129 44%
Social Sciences 39 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 2%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 60 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,232,812
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#40
of 935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,176
of 94,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them