Title |
Hemimetabolous genomes reveal molecular basis of termite eusociality
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41559-017-0459-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mark C. Harrison, Evelien Jongepier, Hugh M. Robertson, Nicolas Arning, Tristan Bitard-Feildel, Hsu Chao, Christopher P. Childers, Huyen Dinh, Harshavardhan Doddapaneni, Shannon Dugan, Johannes Gowin, Carolin Greiner, Yi Han, Haofu Hu, Daniel S. T. Hughes, Ann-Kathrin Huylmans, Carsten Kemena, Lukas P. M. Kremer, Sandra L. Lee, Alberto Lopez-Ezquerra, Ludovic Mallet, Jose M. Monroy-Kuhn, Annabell Moser, Shwetha C. Murali, Donna M. Muzny, Saria Otani, Maria-Dolors Piulachs, Monica Poelchau, Jiaxin Qu, Florentine Schaub, Ayako Wada-Katsumata, Kim C. Worley, Qiaolin Xie, Guillem Ylla, Michael Poulsen, Richard A. Gibbs, Coby Schal, Stephen Richards, Xavier Belles, Judith Korb, Erich Bornberg-Bauer |
Abstract |
Around 150 million years ago, eusocial termites evolved from within the cockroaches, 50 million years before eusocial Hymenoptera, such as bees and ants, appeared. Here, we report the 2-Gb genome of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica, and the 1.3-Gb genome of the drywood termite Cryptotermes secundus. We show evolutionary signatures of termite eusociality by comparing the genomes and transcriptomes of three termites and the cockroach against the background of 16 other eusocial and non-eusocial insects. Dramatic adaptive changes in genes underlying the production and perception of pheromones confirm the importance of chemical communication in the termites. These are accompanied by major changes in gene regulation and the molecular evolution of caste determination. Many of these results parallel molecular mechanisms of eusocial evolution in Hymenoptera. However, the specific solutions are remarkably different, thus revealing a striking case of convergence in one of the major evolutionary transitions in biological complexity. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 38 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 22 | 11% |
France | 6 | 3% |
Germany | 6 | 3% |
Mexico | 6 | 3% |
Japan | 5 | 3% |
Canada | 4 | 2% |
Netherlands | 4 | 2% |
Denmark | 3 | 2% |
Other | 36 | 19% |
Unknown | 63 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 98 | 51% |
Scientists | 89 | 46% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 284 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 21% |
Researcher | 44 | 15% |
Student > Master | 36 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 33 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 4% |
Other | 39 | 14% |
Unknown | 59 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 118 | 42% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 68 | 24% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 2% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 1% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 1% |
Other | 11 | 4% |
Unknown | 72 | 25% |