You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), February 2018
John Cook, Peter Ellerton, David Kinkead
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 634 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||462||73%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||24||4%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||7||1%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||46||18%|
|Student > Master||29||11%|
|Student > Bachelor||22||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||24||9%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||14||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 581. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,942,536 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
of 5,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 448,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,942,536 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.