↓ Skip to main content

Testing for the ‘predictability’ of dynamically triggered earthquakes in The Geysers geothermal field

Overview of attention for article published in Earth & Planetary Science Letters, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Testing for the ‘predictability’ of dynamically triggered earthquakes in The Geysers geothermal field
Published in
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, March 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.01.015
Authors

Chastity Aiken, Xiaofeng Meng, Jeanne Hardebeck

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,923,865
of 12,470,921 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#1,907
of 2,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,959
of 339,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#51
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,470,921 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.