↓ Skip to main content

Política Nacional de Promoção da Saúde: um estudo de avaliabilidade em uma região de saúde no Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Política Nacional de Promoção da Saúde: um estudo de avaliabilidade em uma região de saúde no Brasil
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, January 2018
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232018231.24682015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Socorro de Araújo Dias, Irlanda Pontes de Oliveira, Lucilane Maria Sales da Silva, Maristela Inês Osawa Vasconcelos, Maria de Fátima Antero Sousa Machado, Franklin Delano Soares Forte, Lielma Carla Chagas da Silva

Abstract

The National Health Promotion Policy (PNPS) is based on the broadened concept of health and presents the promotion of health as a set of strategies and ways of promoting health, both individually and collectively with responsibilities for the three federated entities. The scope of this study was to develop an evaluability assessment of the PNPS. It is a qualitative-based evaluability assessment conducted in a health region in the Brazilian Northeast in the year 2013. Participants in the study were 18 key informants directly involved in PNPS implementation, of which eight are municipal health secretaries, six are coordinators of primary health care, two are coordinators of epidemiological surveillance, a general regional coordinator and a regional primary care coordinator. The semi-structured interview and the legal documents of the policy were used for gathering information from 2006 to 2012. The construction of the logical model made it possible to reflect on the possible influences of the context on the PNPS implementation. The results showed that PNPS is not yet sufficiently established in the health region and pointed to the need to incorporate specific monitoring and evaluation instruments for this policy.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Professor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Sports and Recreations 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 30 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#5,808,344
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#295
of 1,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,246
of 442,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#3
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,882 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.