↓ Skip to main content

Cerebral tissue oxygenation measured by two different probes: challenges and interpretation

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cerebral tissue oxygenation measured by two different probes: challenges and interpretation
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00134-011-2316-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julius Dengler, Christin Frenzel, Peter Vajkoczy, Stefan Wolf, Peter Horn

Abstract

Cerebral tissue oxygenation (PbrO(2)) is most frequently monitored using a Licox CC1.SB system (LX, Integra Neuroscience, France) but recently a new probe--the Neurovent-PTO (NV)--was introduced by a different manufacturer (Raumedic, Germany). There are no prospective data on how these probes compare in clinical routine. We therefore compared both probes in comatose patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) or subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) during dynamic changes of inspirational oxygen fraction (FiO(2)) and mean arterial pressure (MAP).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 24%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 16 29%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 51%
Psychology 4 7%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Engineering 3 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,837
of 4,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,124
of 119,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.