↓ Skip to main content

Single-Dose Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Two Formulations of Lenalidomide 25 mg in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized Crossover Study

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Therapy, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Single-Dose Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Two Formulations of Lenalidomide 25 mg in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized Crossover Study
Published in
Advances in Therapy, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12325-018-0660-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

SeungHwan Lee, Jun Gi Hwang, Sang Yeob Park, Hye Jung Lim, Sa-Won Lee, Min-Hyo Seo, JaeWoo Kim, Jang Hee Hong

Abstract

Lenalidomide is used for the treatment of multiple myeloma in combination with dexamethasone. The purpose of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and assess the bioequivalence of two formulations of lenalidomide 25 mg: Lenalid® 25 mg tablet (test formulation) and Revlimid® 25 mg capsule (reference formulation). A randomized, single-dose, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence crossover study was conducted in 42 healthy subjects. All subjects were randomly assigned to one of the two sequences, and they received a single dose of test or reference formulation in the first period and the alternative formulation during the next period under fasting conditions. Serial blood samples for PK evaluation were collected up to 24 h post-dose and the PK parameters were estimated by non-compartmental methods. Throughout the study, tolerability was assessed on the basis of adverse events, vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests. The test formulation showed similar PK profiles to those of the reference formulation. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence interval (CI) of the test formulation to the reference formulation for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was 0.9995 (0.9250-1.0799) and the corresponding value for the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time of last quantifiable concentration (AUCt) was 0.9648 (0.9451-0.9850). Both CIs were within the conventional bioequivalence range of 0.8-1.25. The tolerability profile was not significantly different between the two formulations. This study found that the PKs of the two formulations of lenalidomide 25 mg were similar and the test formulation met the regulatory criteria for assuming bioequivalence with the reference formulation. Samyang Biopharmaceutical Corp.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 29%
Other 4 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 12%
Linguistics 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Decision Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2018.
All research outputs
#18,585,544
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#1,671
of 2,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,805
of 437,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#28
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.