You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of 5‐fluorouracil treatment for actinic keratosis – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Dermatology, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04045.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah A. Askew, Sharon M. Mickan, H. Peter Soyer, David Wilkinson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 24% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 50% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2019.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Dermatology
#621
of 3,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,774
of 111,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Dermatology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.